Joel B. Steinberg

Joel Barnet Steinberg was born May 25, 1941. He grew up in the Bronx, but his family moved to the City of Yonkers, a northern suburb of New York City, when he was a teenager. He attended Gorton High School in Yonkers graduating with a distinctly mediocre record. Next, he enrolled in Fordham University, where he graduated with a political science degree in 1962. Steinberg then attended New York University Law School until dropping out in 1964.

He joined the Air Force the next year. He served overseas until he was honorably discharged as a lieutenant in March 1968.. He resumed law school and eventually graduated in 1970. He was admitted to the bar without taking the bar exam under a special program that made an exception for students whose studies were interrupted by military service. His grades though were less than average and some of his friends later commented about his ability as a lawyer. One of his early law partners, Brian C. Baker, said, “I’m not sure you could become friends with him, ultimately. The word manipulative comes up most in my mind.” According to those that knew him, Steinberg was often withdrawn and sometimes hostile. Some friends recounted situations in which they described Steinberg as verbally abusive to women.

But there were also good things to be said about Steinberg. He was once described as “warm, fatherly and generous.” A fellow attorney who knew Steinberg for 17 years said: “I think everybody who knew him is shocked.” During his early career in the 1970s, Steinberg concentrated on criminal law, including many drug cases. That specialty was not unusual since the docket of Manhattan was filled with drug cases. His talents as an attorney, though, were less than spectacular.

One of his clients recounted that Steinberg himself was an avid drug user. “He was constantly talking about drugs, asking everyone to get him drugs,” said John Novack, accused of drug smuggling. “We were scared to death.” Steinberg denied this and said Novack was making “a last ditch effort to get out of jail.” Another lawyer told The Daily News that Steinberg was “nice enough, but a little eccentric. He was something of an oddball.”
 

Hedda, the Battered Spouse

Hedda Nussbaum wanted to be a writer. She graduated from New York’s Hunter College in the early 1970s and later became a public school teacher. In September 1974, she got a job with Random House, a Manhattan publisher. She was highly regarded and admired by co-workers. An executive at the company told the New York Times that “she was very attractive as a prospective employee.” Hedda was personable and had a wide range of interests. “She had the experience of working with kids…and she could write,” her boss once said.

She wrote two children’s books, both of which were published by Random House. Plants Do Amazing Things was published in 1977 and was a science book explaining the workings and lives of plants. She had met Joel Steinberg two yeas earlier at a party. Part of the book’s dedication read, “And to Joel, my everyday inspiration.” Soon, they were seeing each other and became romantically involved. “I thought he was godlike,” she once said. Her second book, Animals Build Amazing Homes was published in 1979 and detailed how different animals built their homes in the wild. Both books were well received and remain in print.

Another of Hedda’s co-workers, Larry Weinberg, who was also an attorney, became friendly with Hedda and admired her ability to work with writers. “She was sensitive, extremely gentle and loving to a writer, enormously encouraging,” he later said to the press, “I was extremely taken with her as a friend.” Hedda had a promising future. But that rosy prospect ended when the abuse began.

According to Hedda, Steinberg first hit her in 1978. Much to her later regret, she chose to ignore the violence. “Battered woman” was a phrase largely unknown. The frequency and dimensions of spousal abuse were not a part of public discussion. Perhaps, in part, that’s why Hedda Nussbaum chose to live with Steinberg’s attacks. She later said that she hoped that he would change or the beatings would stop. The sense of shame or embarrassment that an abused woman feels may have also prevented her from seeking treatment. As a result, the situation became worse, a lot worse. “I saw her wheeling the baby (Lisa) down the hall,” a co-worker told reporters, “And the baby had a cut lip, and Hedda had on sunglasses and a bandage…everybody knew that she was a lady with a lot of trouble.” By 1981, the abuse was so severe that she was fired from her job because of repeated absences due to her physical condition.

Over the next few years, Hedda suffered through an ordeal that seems almost incredible in its viciousness and intensity. She sustained black eyes, broken bones, broken teeth, a fractured nose, burns, beatings and other acts which were detailed at length during Steinberg’s murder trial. On November 2, 1987, when she was brought to the hospital, Dr. Neil Spiegel was the examining physician. “She was a 45-year-old woman that appeared much older than her stated age,” he said later. She suffered from anemia and was a “hunchback” due to calcium deficiency. Spiegel testified that her injuries consisted of cuts on her lip, broken cheekbones, a broken nose, a large bruise on her right buttock, multiple broken ribs and ulcers on her legs so widespread that they were life threatening.

“She was physically as badly injured as any battered woman I have ever seen-short of those who were killed,” a social worker later told reporters.



Lisa

Lisa was born on May 14, 1981, at Beekman Downtown Hospital in lower Manhattan. She was the daughter of Michele Launders, 19, and a 20-year-old college student unable to provide financial support. Opposed to having an abortion, Michele visited a physician sympathetic to her plight. He made arrangements for the baby to be adopted. Through the doctor, Michele met Joel Steinberg, introduced to her as a lawyer who handled many adoptions.

Steinberg told Michele that he would do his best to find a suitable couple for her baby and assured her that the child would have a good life, better than any she could ever hope to provide. This was important to Michele because even though she had chosen to relinquish her baby, she wanted the child to have a comfortable life. When the baby was born, Joel Steinberg had Michele signed some documents. That was the last day Michele saw her baby alive.

But Steinberg simply took the baby home and kept her. No legal adoption was arranged. She grew up with Steinberg as her father and Hedda Nussbaum as her mother. Some law enforcement officials speculated that Steinberg avoided the usual adoption procedures because he wanted to bypass the legally mandated in-house visit after a child has been adopted. A legal adoption would also have required an inquiry into his domestic life – including an interview with Hedda Nussbaum. Meanwhile, Michele was told that a well-to-do attorney on Manhattan’s Upper East Side had become the adoptive parent. She went on with her life, convinced that Lisa had a safe and wonderful future.

Lisa attended New York City Public School 41. Teachers remembered her well. She had a way with adults that did not go unnoticed. “She was the most wonderful, loving creature, who could talk to you like an adult, which was an extraordinary gift,” said a family friend.

It is unclear when the abuse of Lisa began. Some tenants at 14 W. 10th Street claimed they called the police many times to report Steinberg’s suspected abuse of Hedda. But the child abuse allegations seem not to have begun until about 1983 when one of Hedda’s colleagues called a hot line to report suspected abuse of Lisa. Another tenant called the hot line because she felt that if Hedda was being beaten, Lisa was also in jeopardy. Suzanne Trazoff of the Human Resources Administration told a reporter that the complaints were investigated in 1984 – which included a visit to the Steinberg residence -- but no signs of child abuse were found.

Teachers at P.S. 41, where Lisa attended the first grade, did see a few bruises on her face. When Elliot Koreman, the school principal, asked about the injuries, Steinberg and Nussbaum said that Lisa was struck by her 16-month-old brother, Mitchell. “Don’t you think we’ve tortured ourselves asking if she exhibited anything in school?” Koreman later told reporters. “Things like this happen,” he said, “We have no foolproof method of detecting them. We’re doing the best we can.” But inside her home, Lisa must have been suffering terribly.

Doctors and nurses at St. Vincent’s were appalled when they examined Lisa on the morning of November 2, 1987. She had cuts on both of her arms, legs, abdomen, stomach and head. Her feet and ankles were covered with a crust of black dirt and grime. Lisa’s long, once-beautiful hair was a twisted, matted mess and had not been washed for quite some time. Under her tangled mane, doctors discovered a severe, fresh bruise on her forehead. When they turned Lisa over on her belly, they found one large, unusual bruise near the center of her lower back. Her upper back was covered with both old and new bruises, red, black, and blue in color. Both calves had yellowish-brown marks, apparently from old injuries. She had bruising and trauma marks on her buttocks. How precisely she obtained these injuries remained unclear since Lisa never regained consciousness. Her brain was hemorrhaging and she was already near death.

Lisa had been prone on the bathroom floor for hours, unattended, while Joel Steinberg, fully aware that she was injured, went out to meet friends. Hedda stayed home alone with Mitchell, the 18-month-old baby, and waited. Never did she lift up the telephone to call for an ambulance, a friend, a neighbor, or anyone else. “Joel said he would take care of her, he would get her up when he got back,” Hedda later told the court through her tears, “and I didn’t want to show disloyalty or distrust to him, so I didn’t call.”

 

She Won't Be An Olympic Athlete

In 1986, there were 67,750 reported child abuse cases in New York. At least 42 died. The Steinberg case, however, seemed different from the very start. A story of a little girl who may have been beaten to death by a Manhattan attorney and a book editor, two people who are not normally associated with such an event, was front-page material. Moreover, Hedda Nussbaum’s shocking physical state underscored the violence within the Steinberg household. But it was Steinberg’s unusual behavior both before and after Lisa was brought to the hospital that stoked reporters’ interest.

He made bizarre comments to doctors and investigators and seemed indifferent to the storm that was building around him. When police questioned Steinberg about fresh cuts on his knuckles, he said he didn’t know he had them and offered no further explanation. On the night Lisa was brought to the emergency room, Dr. Patrick Kilhenny, a resident, told him that Lisa was in serious condition and would suffer permanent damage even if she survived. “Well, what you’re saying is that she’s not going to be an Olympic athlete, but she’ll survive,” Steinberg replied. When the doctor testified at the trial the following year, he said he remembered seeing a strange smile on Steinberg’s face at the time. “He smiled. It was a big grin,” Kilhenny recounted.

Earlier, a nurse had confronted Steinberg and had told him that his daughter was brain dead. “Is there anything else wrong with her?” Steinberg replied. He then told the emergency staff that he had to leave. “I just couldn’t believe anyone could act that cold and uncaring,” the nurse said during the trial. Aaron Rosenthal, the assistant chief of detectives, told reporters “the girl’s feet were so black, they had to scrape the dirt off them and she was suffering from lack of oxygen.” Lisa was placed on life support, but clinically, she was already dead. She exhibited no brain activity and was unable to breathe unassisted. The prognosis was bleak.

Late that same morning, both Steinberg and Nussbaum were picked up by detectives at their filthy W. 10th Street apartment. They were charged with the attempted murder of Lisa. Police told reporters the apartment looked like “it wasn’t cleaned in about a year.” Also found during a search of the apartment was $25,000 in cash, drug paraphernalia and a small quantity of cocaine. The suspects were brought over to the 6th Pct. where both refused to give any statements. Steinberg requested his own lawyer. “They’re both very aware of their rights,” Det. Rosenthal said later. Steinberg and Nussbaum were charged with first degree assault, attempted murder, and endangering the welfare of a child.

A debate ensued during the next few days as to who was entitled to act as Lisa’s legal guardian. Although declared brain dead, Lisa remained legally “alive” because she was on a respirator. Eventually, it was determined that the city was the child’s guardian. On Thursday, November 6, Lisa was removed from life support at 8:40 a.m. and died immediately. The charges against Steinberg and Nussbaum were amended to murder. A grand jury began hearing testimony the same day. Mitchell, Lisa’s brother, who was found tied to a playpen in Steinberg’s apartment, was turned over to the Human Resources Dept.

In the meantime, a defense lawyer was assigned to the case. But his representation lasted only one day. A young, brash Manhattan attorney had already been hired by the Nussbaum family to craft Hedda’s defense. His name was Barry Scheck, a brilliant lawyer who perhaps saw the case as a chance for prominence. In his very first press conference Scheck said Hedda would cooperate with prosecutors and testify before the grand jury. It was the first step in a long, difficult journey to convince prosecutors that Hedda Nussbaum was a victim too. She was a “battered woman,” assaulted by Steinberg for years, emotionally abused and subjugated to such a degree that she was incapable of thinking rationally. Her nose was shattered. Her ribs were broken. She had two black eyes. She was literally beaten senseless. How else to explain to a jury that a mother, alone in her apartment, allowed her unconscious six-year-old daughter to lie on a cold bathroom floor for hours; unwilling or unable to make a simple phone call that might have saved her life?
 

The City That Couldn't Save A Little Girl

New York City’s municipal government is larger than that of many nations. It is a sprawling, diverse, incomprehensible network of bureaucracy. Probably nowhere in the world is there a city that has as many commissions, departments, social service agencies, family courts, programs, committees all dedicated to the welfare of its citizens. Critics have said that the city is drowning under its own weight, so large is its governmental infrastructure. There are child protective groups of every shape and size, all focused on protecting children from abuse and exploitation. When Lisa died, all of it, the vast empire of social programs, the billions of dollars it spent every year and the thousands of people it employed, became the target of fierce public scrutiny and a torrent of angry criticism.

Tenants at 14 W. 10th Street and neighbors were particularly vociferous. “Who protected this child?” one said. The New York Times interviewed a producer for the television show “20/20” who lived on the first floor of the Steinberg’s building. “We reported it to all the proper agencies,” she said. A neighbor who said she called a child-abuse hot line said responding investigators were unable to verify the charges. “They came and did an investigation and said there was no evidence of child abuse,” she said, “You can imagine how we felt later when this woman walked in with another baby!” She was referring to Mitchell; the 16-month-old baby who cops found tied to a playpen.

William Grinker, then New York’s commissioner of human resources, said that reports of child abuse at the Steinberg household were mishandled. “I don’t think a government agency is responsible every time something goes wrong in a person’s private life,” he said. Though he wouldn’t characterize the Steinberg case a success for his department, Grinker denied any responsibility for Lisa’s death. But the public’s outrage grew.

Disclosure after disclosure revealed that the Steinbergs had come to the city’s attention repeatedly. In each instance however, nothing was done. Child Protective Services personnel had visited the apartment a total of three times in 1983 and 1984. Each visit stemmed from reports of child abuse. The social workers were steadfast that there was no evidence of abuse. To make matters worse, it was soon discovered that the police had been to the Steinberg’s apartment on October 6, just weeks before Lisa was killed, on an anonymous complaint of a family dispute. Hedda was found with several facial injuries, apparently inflicted during a fight with Joel. Hedda refused to press charges and the police left.

“What should the neighbors do?” The Times asked in a November 6 editorial. “What police saw on Monday suggests that more neighbors should have called and called again, thus motivating more police response.” But there was no simple or quick explanation for the bureaucratic bungling of the entire Steinberg-Nussbaum affair. A defenseless woman was beaten, apparently for years with little or no intervention, and despite in-home visits from social workers and police, two kids were grossly mistreated. Now one of the children had suffered a grisly death.

One neighbor, who could have been speaking for an entire city, said to reporters: “I ask myself what else I should have done. I don’t know what else I could have done, short of dragging the kid out the door with a gun!”



Trial By TV

On Friday, November 6, 1987, Joel Steinberg was indicted for second degree murder, first degree manslaughter, and endangering the welfare of a child. He was held without bail and placed under a suicide watch on Riker’s Island, New York’s sprawling detention center. District Attorney Robert Morgenthau said that Lisa’s death was “one of the most tragic and horrible cases that we’ve seen.” Morgenthau also blasted the state’s adoption procedures, which had placed Lisa in Nussbaum’s and Steinberg’s care. “If there had been a thorough background investigation, there was a chance he (Steinberg) would not have been granted custody,” he said.

In the months following the couple’s arrests there were hundreds of stories about Lisa’s life. The hostility toward the defendants was remarkable. Almost daily, the city’s newspapers ran a story about Steinberg and Nussbaum. Repeated printings and airings of photos of a smiling and adorable Lisa generated sympathy for the little girl and antipathy for her parents.

But it wasn’t just the photos or the press stories that fed the public’s interest. In December 1987, television cameras were allowed into New York’s courtrooms for the first time. It was an 18-month experiment in which the effects of live television coverage of trials would be measured and assessed. (This experiment lead to the founding of Court TV in July 1991.) In March 1988, cameras were permitted at the sentencing of Robert Chambers, the man convicted of murdering Jennifer Levin in Central Park. That broadcast was a “success” – there was little public outcry about cameras and ratings soared. Live coverage of a trial was the next step. The Steinberg case featured two social issues: spousal abuse and child abuse. “Our obligation is to broadcast the testimony as much as possible,” said one CBS executive. “We felt the viewer deserved to see more of the testimony than we could put in one of our newscasts.”

But then, as now, the most vociferous objections to television coverage came from lawyers and judges. Would lawyers play to the cameras? Would witnesses be intimidated knowing that their words were being broadcast? Even though there faces would not be shown, how would jurors react? Would television coverage increase the chances of jury tampering? As is true with all televised trials, applications for coverage were submitted to the judge. The judge could grant or reject them. The applications were approved and the stage was set. CNN, however, declined to broadcast the trial. A network executive opined that Nussbaum “was not an exciting witness.”

The trial opened October 25, 1988. In his opening statement, assistant district attorney Peter Casolaro said the evidence would “show a graphic and grotesque chain of events” and that “Joel Steinberg beat Lisa so severely that he caused her death…” Casolaro pointed to Steinberg and said, “His story is inconsistent and impossible to reconcile with Lisa Steinberg’s condition.” Ira London, a top-flight criminal defense lawyer, replied that Nussbaum’s testimony “will be the product of a delusional woman suffering from mental illness in a psychiatric hospital.” He promised to provide witnesses who would testify to Nussbaum’s “self-destructive romance with satanic cults, her sadomasochistic behavior outside the home and her involvement with pornography.”

But on October 26, 1988, Manhattan’s District Attorney Robert M. Morgenthau came to a pivotal and dramatic decision. Hedda Nussbaum would not be prosecuted in any way for the death of Lisa. The charges were dropped with the expectation she would be the star witness against her former lover, Joel Steinberg. “Our investigation revealed that Miss Nussbaum was so physically and mentally incapacitated on the night of the murder,” said prosecutor John McCusker, “that she was not criminally responsible for Lisa’s death.” The decision was greeted with immediate animosity and controversy. Some people felt that despite her condition, Nussbaum still could have made a phone call for help. But there could be no doubt that her attorney, Barry Scheck, had scored for his client and scored big time. Hedda, who stayed home rearranging Joel’s business files all night while a 6-year-old child lay on the floor forcing her to step over the body to go to the bathroom, would face no charges in her death.
 

What Killed Lisa?

For prosecutors to sustain a charge of murder, they would have to conclusively establish the cause of death. Although Lisa was brought into St. Vincent’s Hospital on the morning of November 2, 1987, in a fatal coma, she did not die “officially” until November 5 when she was removed from life support. “After it was turned off,” a doctor later said, “there were a few minutes her heart continued to beat.” How she came to be in that coma was essential to establish criminal liability.

Dr. Aglae Charlot, the medical examiner who performed Lisa’s autopsy wrote in her initial reports that the victim’s injuries were “suggestive but not conclusive of trauma.” During her testimony during the week of November 12, 1988, though, she stated that Lisa may have died from blunt trauma as the result of a homicide. Dr. Charlot was not the only doctor to come to that conclusion.

Dr. Mary Lell, the hospital’s chief of pediatric neurology, testified that Lisa’s head injuries were consistent with a forceful blow and that the blow could have been a fist. She also ruled out the prospect of choking or poisoning as a cause of death. When the possibility of a fall was suggested, Dr. Lel was emphatic. “I’ve seen a number of children who have sustained that type of injury…the injury that would be sustained in that situation is completely different from the injury sustained by Lisa Steinberg.”

But it was Dr. Douglas C. Miller of the New York University Medical Center who made the strongest impression on the jury. He said that Lisa’s brain damage was “blunt head trauma, and nothing else.” He made the comparison with the head blows suffered by professional boxers and who sometimes die from them. “They never have their skulls fractured either,” he said. The fatal blow would have to be one of sufficient force, a fact that worked against Steinberg because it was alleged that Hedda Nussbaum was in such a debilitated condition on the night of November 1, 1987, she simply did not have the energy to strike that hard. “They (the blows) would have to have been…a tremendous force,” Miller said. In short, Lisa’s brain had been smashed into the walls of her skull.

Joel Talks

As the trial moved on, the specter of Hedda Nussabum’s testimony must have concerned Steinberg’s attorney, Ira D. London, and terrified the defendant. Like most defendants, Steinberg would not testify so as not to supply the prosecution with another chance to re-tell the crime, but also to avoid making any incriminating statements. The jury would not be allowed to see an easily excited defendant who had a lot of explaining to do as to how a six-year-old girl wound up dead in his apartment while he went out to dinner with friends. Up until the week of November 25, Steinberg kept his comments to a bare minimum. He gave no interviews and was not required to testify at pre-trial hearings or at the grand jury.

But he couldn’t remain totally silent. Over the objections of his attorneys, Steinberg wrote a letter to Newsday, a Long Island newspaper that published it November 25. In this hand written letter, Steinberg said, “My feelings for Lisa are almost inexpressible. She was the world to me.” He went on to say that he loved her and missed her deeply. “Just once,” he wrote, “look at her smile in one of those photographs and you will understand my feelings. My sadness and sense of loss are more than I can bear at times”

Word had already reached Steinberg’s defense team that Hedda was expected to testify within days. Steinberg wrote that he was concerned about what she would say. “Regarding Hedda,” he said, “I must tell you that I loved her very much. I can only hope that she is capable of the truth in relating the events of Lisa’s life and the events of Lisa’s last night with us.” Since her arrest, Hedda was hospitalized and then received psychiatric care at the Four Winds Hospital in Westchester County. She had no contact with Steinberg since November 2, 1987. It was part of her treatment regimen that she should have no communication with him whatsoever. For Steinberg, that meant he would be unable to manipulate her. With his freedom at stake and a prison term looming, he must have imagined that he could sway Hedda still. But he knew that he had a great deal to fear from an ex-lover turned state’s witness. “Given what I have read,” he continued, “I fear Hedda may no longer be the person I knew and loved.”

Steinberg was right on both counts: he had a lot to fear and Hedda was no longer a punching bag.

 

Hedda Takes the Stand

Long anticipated and feared by both the prosecution team and the defense, Hedda Nussbaum took the stand on the afternoon of December 1, 1988. Walking silently past the man she said abused and tortured her for years, she took her seat before a tense courtroom. Television audiences were particularly intrigued since in 1988, live trials on TV were not as common as they are today. Hedda’s facial injuries were plainly visible and gave her a strange, almost artificial appearance.

The 46-year-old spoke slowly and deliberately. She was, on occasion, detached, evasive, forgetful and emotional. She seemed confused, often mixing dates and times. She had difficulty recalling certain details about Lisa’s last days. But the overall tale Hedda told was a nightmare from start to finish. She said that Steinberg forced her to sleep in the bathtub or on the floor and she had to ask him for permission to eat and drink. Over the next few days, the jury recoiled at the mind-boggling story of the compulsive, masochistic relationship between Joel Steinberg and Hedda Nussbaum.

“I was extremely attached to him,” she explained. “I thought he was the most wonderful person I had ever met, and I, well, basically, I worshipped him literally. I thought he had supernatural powers of ESP and healing, and a lot of godlike powers.” But the abuse began, she said, almost immediately after they met. In early 1978, Steinberg struck Nussbaum in the eye and she required hospital treatment. That same year, she received ten black eyes from Steinberg. In 1981, he beat her so badly, Nussbaum had to go to Beekman Hospital on her own, and received surgery for a ruptured spleen. Doctors said that had she not come for treatment, she would have died. Over the next few years, she was beaten with a broomstick handle, a metal exercise bar, had her teeth knocked out several times, suffered a broken nose, had her hair pulled out, and her ribs broken. Prosecutors cited 31 specific instances of alleged abuse by Steinberg. The judge allowed five of those incidents to be admitted.

Despite years of beatings and mistreatment, Hedda never succeeded in breaking away from Joel. “He seemed to be extremely intelligent and bright, and I loved to listen to him talk,” she said, “…what attracted me to him, his eyes, he had bright, shining eyes, alive eyes that I found very attractive.” Although the beatings continued throughout their time together, Nussbaum couldn’t leave Steinberg. “I felt it was the worst thing in the world that could happen to me,” she testified, “that I couldn’t survive without him, and I felt like I would kill myself if I was without him.”

Nussbaum also told the court she had been using cocaine for about seven years. “That varied quite a bit,” she said, “sometimes once in a couple of months, sometimes a few days in a row. Once every few weeks or something like that. It varied a lot.” She testified that she freebased cocaine with Joel on many occasions and with friends as well.

On the second day of her testimony, Nussbaum told the jury about bizarre cults, child pornography and hypnotic powers. Nussbaum said that she had been hypnotized and began “having sex with everyone in the world, practically.” She said that at some point, she told doctors that she believed Lisa was sexually abused. “I believe that I said that I had caused Lisa to be involved in some sort of sexual activity also,” she told the court. According to Nussbaum, these incidents happened in front of many people: “I believed I had many incidents of such things and that Lisa was involved to some extent also.” When the prosecutor asked how old Lisa was at that time, her response was the only sound in the room.

“About two and a half,” she said.
 

Lisa's Last Night

Hedda Nussbaum was on the stand for seven days. Each day brought new and disturbing revelations about her torturous life under Steinberg’s Svengali-like control. But it was her testimony concerning the night of November 1, 1987, that had the jury’s undivided attention. Her description of Lisa’s death was critical to the prosecution and would determine Joel Steinberg’s fate.

Nussbaum told the court that Steinberg awoke about 3 p.m. She said that she had not slept at all the night before. “The first thing that I remember is that Joel asked both Lisa and myself if we had drunk enough water that day…Joel always explained that I didn’t drink enough water,” she said. When she told him that she did not, Steinberg made Hedda and Lisa eat hot pepper. According to Hedda, Steinberg then stated that he was going out for dinner. A few minutes later, Lisa asked Hedda “Do you think Daddy is going to take me with him tonight?” Hedda said she replied to Lisa, “Well, go in and ask him yourself!”

Lisa went into the bedroom where Steinberg was getting dressed while Hedda went to the bathroom. According to Hedda’s testimony, Steinberg then walked into the bathroom holding Lisa, who was unconscious. Hedda said this occurred about 6:00 p.m. “She was lying in his arms limp,” she said, “And I said ‘What happened?’ He said, ‘What’s the difference what happened? This is your child. Hasn’t this gone far enough?’” They laid the unconscious girl on the bathroom floor while Hedda attempted to revive her. But Lisa was not responding. While she continued her efforts at first aid, Hedda said, Steinberg went to the bedroom and finished dressing for dinner with his friend.

At about 7:00 p.m., Steinberg was ready to leave. Hedda testified that he told her “Relax. Go with her. Stay in harmony with her.” Nussbaum stated that she was worried about Lisa but listened to Steinberg when he “promised he would get her up when he got back.” She told the court that Steinberg called the apartment while he was out and asked how Lisa was. While he was on the phone, Steinberg gave Hedda permission to eat. She said she told him that Lisa was still lying on the bathroom floor unconscious. Hedda said that she still tried to revive her but nothing worked. “I realized no matter what I did, it didn’t seem to make much difference,” she told the court, “so I didn’t need to work with her every minute. And I wanted to keep busy. So I rearranged Joel’s files.”

When Steinberg returned later that evening, Hedda said, they freebased cocaine. Freebasing cocaine was the predecessor of crack and required special paraphernalia to burn the drug properly. “You put the crystallized cocaine, the free base, in the top part of the pipe,” Hedda testified, “put water in the pipe and then you draw through a tube. Mr. Steinberg smoked for a couple of hours until the cocaine was, that we had, was gone and I smoked a small amount.” Hedda testified that while they freebased Steinberg mentioned Lisa. “One thing he said was about Lisa, ‘I knocked her down and she didn’t want to get up again. The staring business had gotten to be too much for her,” she said. “Joel had been saying that I was staring at him and that both of the children had been staring at him.” Hedda said that they continued to smoke cocaine until about 4:00 a.m. When they checked on Lisa again, she was still unconscious. They picked her up and placed her on the bed while Hedda looked through a medical dictionary for advice.

Hedda said that Steinberg remained awake and read books to see if he could find out what was wrong with Lisa. At about 6:30 a.m., Hedda said, Steinberg called out for her and yelled, “She stopped breathing!” Hedda said she wanted to call 911 but Steinberg told her to wait a few minutes while he tried to give her CPR. When that failed, Steinberg finally told Hedda to call for help. By that time, Lisa had been on the cold, bathroom floor for nearly 12 hours.

“I thought Joel would be able to restore her,” Hedda told the court, “I feel horrible. It’s something I’ll have to live with and regret for the rest of my life.”

 

The Verdict Comes In

After the closing arguments, anticipation was high that Steinberg would be convicted on all counts. The jury received the case for deliberations on January 23, 1989 and for the next eight days; the jury contemplated the fate of Joel Steinberg while an entire city awaited the outcome. Jurors asked to review testimony of several witnesses including Dr. Neil Spiegel who examined Hedda Nussbaum on the night of November 3, 1987. His description of Nussbaum, who he said resembled “an old person who had cancer,” was pivotal in determining if she was capable of inflicting the type of head trauma Lisa sustained.

On January 30, the jury was done. Steinberg stood behind the defense table with his lawyer as the verdict was read at 6:40 p.m. On the second degree murder charge, he was found “not guilty.” On the first degree manslaughter charge, the verdict was “guilty.” Steinberg shook his head, shrugged his shoulders and appeared angry, but he remained silent. Steinberg had escaped the most serious charge but he still faced decades in prison. He was led out of the room and remanded into custody until sentencing. After three-months, 52 witnesses, more than 100 exhibits and 6,000 pages of testimony, the trial was over.

Jurors later commented on the eight days of deliberations. Tempers flared as they struggled to reach a verdict. “We all became absolutely positive that Hedda couldn’t do it,” the jury foreman told the New York Times, “There was no way a person in her condition could strike this tremendous blow that killed Lisa.” Although Nussbaum was the star witness and many considered her testimony devastating to Steinberg, the jury felt just the opposite. “Hedda’s testimony we used practically not at all,” another juror said. But there were disagreements as well. “It was rough,” another juror said, “We were not near deadlock, but sometimes we were near exhaustion.”

Not everyone was happy with the verdict. Michele Launders, Lisa’s birthmother, ran from the courtroom in tears. She attended the three-month trial every day and always sat directly behind Joel Steinberg. She once said that only a murder conviction could “give Lisa justice and let her rest in peace.” And no matter Steinberg’s fate, there remained the lingering belief that Hedda Nussbaum had escaped culpability. Her attorney, Barry Scheck, said that after the verdict Hedda “was upset and anxious and relieved that it’s all over.”

For television viewers, the trial was a resounding success, as the ratings indicated. Hedda’s mangled face and battered appearance riveted viewers. Her testimony generated considerable public sympathy for Hedda and preserved her status as a victim. “The way she looked and spoke was more dramatic than Meryl Streep,” a Columbia professor told reporters. On the other hand, Steinberg, whose dark appearance on TV reinforced his guilt, suffered from the presence of cameras. “It was unfortunate for Steinberg that he looks like evil,” another professor said.

At his March 24, 1989, sentencing, Steinberg offered his version of events. “At no point did I ever strike them in any form,” he said of the children, “Those children were not locked in a house of horrors.” He said that he and Lisa got along well and that he “had a consistently joyous, happy relationship with her.” He pointed out that his only crime was an “error of judgment.” As for his prosecution, Steinberg claimed that he was being treated unfairly. “It’s not like a defendant who stands before you and perpetrates a crime on an outside victim,” he said, “I’m the loss, the victim.”

Judge Harold Rothwax disagreed and sentenced him to 8 1/3 to 25 years, the maximum.
 

"It's Very Painful!"

In January 2002, Joel Steinberg testified at a parole hearing in Southport Correctional Facility in New York. His prior release hearing, which was denied, was on February 8, 2000. Although Judge Rothwax’s recommendation was against Steinberg’s parole, he is still entitled to apply for release, which can be granted at anytime after a hearing and the state parole board’s approval.

In his latest hearing, Steinberg maintained that his conviction was based solely on his failure to obtain medical aid for Lisa. He pointed out that Lisa had no “external injuries” and said that fact was clearly stated by the medical examiner. “There are no external injuries…and she (the medical examiner) says there is no trauma to the brain,” Steinberg said. “That’s not even equivocal,” he continued, “…the hospital reports from St. Vincent’s clearly show that they examined Lisa upon entry.”

Steinberg was asked by parole board commission Marietta Gailor for his version of the crime. “I have more responsibility in my own heart and my own soul personally…it’s very easy to realize how many things I did wrong and shouldn’t have done or should have done,” he said. Steinberg went on to describe his relationship with Lisa and Mitchell and said “I was extremely close to and described as a doting parent, totally involved father who maintained a friendship with these children and personally took them for continual medical care and educational care and spent all my time with them. This is a huge loss…it’s very painful.”

Despite his claims of dedication to Lisa and Mitchell, Steinberg’s request for parole was denied. “During the course of the instant offense,” the parole commissioner stated, “a vulnerable child who was in your custody lost her life due to your failure to get medical help for her in a timely manner.” According to the New York’s department of corrections, Steinberg’s next parole hearing is set for January 2004.

Hedda Nussbaum remained under psychiatric treatment for years after the trial and slowly got her life back on track. Eventually, she joined a support group in Westchester County where today she is a counselor for battered women. She has also undergone several surgical procedures to fix broken bones in her nose and her cheeks and to repair damage to her eyes. She was interviewed in April 2002 for a newspaper article in which she said that although she remains traumatized by her experience, she feels she must move on. “They’re my children and they’ll always be my children,” she told reporter Corey Kilgannon, “But I can’t live in the past. I have to live my life now.”

In October 1999, Michele Launders, Lisa’s birth mother, accepted a $985,000 settlement in the litigation she brought against several New York city agencies that she said failed to protect her daughter. Her lawyer told reporters that Michele was “relieved it was over and it gives her closure.” Although the {New York Times} once reported that Steinberg had $3 million at the time of his arrest, Launders was unable to collect anything from him since he had no provable assets in later years.

Lisa is buried in the scenic Gates of Heaven cemetery in Valhalla, New York, a suburb about forty miles north of Manhattan. Her grave rests near a commanding oak tree whose branches seem to hover over it like the protecting arms of a mother she never knew in her brief life. The flat, gray tombstone that marks her final resting place is a scant 18” by 24”, dimensions that are somehow too small for the magnitude and manner of her death. She is remembered well in New York, the smiling face of a little girl who no one could save from inexplicable cruelty.
 

Bibliography

Clifford, Timothy and Whitaker, Barbara. “Hedda Weeps as She Recalls Lisa’s Death”, December 2, 1988, Newsday.

Erlanger, Steven. “Officials Said to Ignore Pleas for Abused Girl”, November 4, 1987, “A Widening Pattern of Abuse Exemplified in Steinberg Case”, November 8, 1987, The New York Times

Goldman, John J. “Maximum Sentence in Girl’s Death”, The Los Angeles Times, March 25, 1989.

Johnson, Joyce (1990) What Lisa Knew. NYC, NY: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.

Johnson, Julie. “Adoption of Slain Girl, 6, May Not Have Occurred”, November 7, 1987, The New York Times

Kaye, Judge decision on “The People & C., Respondent, V. Joel Steinberg, AKA Joel Barnet Steinberg, Appellant “(79 NY 2d 673, 595 N.E. 2nd 845, 584 N.Y. S. 2d 770 (1992))

Kilgannon, Corey. “Hedda Nussbaum, Starting Over”. Westchester Weekly Desk, The New York Times}, April 7, 2002.

Knappman, Edward W. (1994) Great American Trials. Detroit, MI: Visible Ink press.

McFadden, Robert D. “Parents of Girl, 6, Charged With Murder After She Dies”, November 6, 1987, “Slain Girl Was Abused For Weeks, Evidence Shows”, November 8, 1987, “Troopers Took Photos of Girl In Abuse Case”, November 10, 1987, “Lawyer Indicted in the Slaying of His Daughter”, November 12, 1987,The New York Times

Purdum, Todd S. “Abused Girl is Declared Brain Dead”, November 5, 1987, The New York Times

“Parole Hearing January 15, 2002” Transcript furnished by the State of New York Division of Parole, 97 Central Avenue, Albany NY 12206.

Russo, Francine. “The Faces of Hedda Nussbaum”, The New York Times, March 30, 1997.

Sisk, Richard. “Lawyer Was Coked Up Says Client”. The Daily News, November 5, 1987.

Stephens, Mitchell. “It’s News, But Is Steinberg’s Case Really Significant?” Newsday, December 20,1988.

Sullivan, Ronald. “Stifling Tears, Nussbaum Recounts Lisa’s Last Days”, December 2, 1988, “Nussbaum Testimony is Called a Risk”, December 4, 1988, “Steinberg’s Lawyer Predicts Conviction”, January 6, 1989, “A Witness Says Nussbaum Hit and Flung Lisa”, January 7, 1989, “Steinberg Jury Asks Judge to Define Lesser Charge”, January 29, 1989, “Steinberg is Guilty of First Degree Manslaughter”, January 31, 1989, The New York Times.

Uhlig, Mark A. “A System that Couldn’t Save A Child From Lethal Abuse”, November 6, 1987, The New York Times.

Wise, Daniel. “NYC Settles Lisa Child Abuse Suit”, New York Law Journal, October 1, 1999.

 

About the Author

Mark Gado is a police detective with the City of New Rochelle Police Department in New York where he has been employed for nearly 25 years.

He was a federal agent assigned to the Westchester County D.E.A. Task Force in WhitePlains, N.Y. from 1997 to 1999. He received the International Award of Honor from the Narcotic Enforcement Officers Association in New Orleans, LA in 1998. Mark was also named Investigator of the Year 2000 and received dozens of
other awards and commendations during his long police career.

He has been a freelance writer for over 20 years and his work has appeared on numerous websites and in many publications, including Law Enforcement Journal, Cobblestone, A History Magazine for Young People and several cover stories for Strange Days magazine. Mark holds a Bachelors Degree in Criminal Justice 1998 and a Masters in Criminal Justice from Iona College 2001.